This is Part 2 of a 3-part article series that outlines the pathway to the resolution of all degrees of gluten sensitivity, including the well-known celiac reaction.

The series is laid out as follows:

Part 1–Clarification
Part 2–Quantification
Part 3–Elimination

Once there is an understanding that parasites are at the root of gluten allergies, and by extension all allergies, several questions arise, and clarification is needed on many of them:

Which parasites is it common to get? Which parasites cause specific allergies? How do they cause allergies? How do you confirm which parasites you have? How do you get rid of them? How do you know they’re gone? Can you get them again? Where did you get them from? Where do you start???

This is my story of how I eliminated my own gluten allergy and I started where I guess anyone starts: seeing a Doctor and getting a stool analysis done to see which parasites I had.

Recap

In the article titled The Parasite Problem: the Limits of Laboratory Parasite Testing, I outline my experience in having a stool test done. It turned out that the national health regulatory body in my country (Canada) that controls stool testing had a very different agenda from mine.

In short, I asked to be tested for parasites and was instead tested for bacteria: things like flesh eating disease, the bubonic plague and cholera–good things to know I don’t have, but not what I had asked. I had asked to be tested for hookworm, roundworm, tapeworm, whipworm, intestinal fluke, strongyloides, giardia and amoeba.

It turned out that there weren’t formal tests available for most of those. The only nod in the parasite direction was a small note at the bottom of the report, stating “no ovum or parasites seen”, and I was meant to rely on the visual examination process of whoever ran the test as the final verdict of whether I had a single parasite in any organ, gland or tissue. And to my understanding, the cure to my gluten allergy hung in the balance.

The Impasse

There was a disconnect between what I wanted to be tested for and what I was being tested for. At first I took this personally, and I think a lot of other people do too: you shouldn’t. Doctors are as frustrated as you are; stool testing lab techs are as frustrated as everyone else. This isn’t a conspiracy: they don’t test for parasites for the simple reason that they can’t find them. They can find bacteria so that’s what they look for.

Unfortunately, only looking for what you can already find isn’t likely to get you out of the cycle of failing to find when you’ve never found. This is the impasse of the modern health care system in a nutshell. 

As it turns out, it’s nearly impossible to find the parasites in question and this is a worldwide problem. Standard protocol is to check stools with a microscope or run immune system assays on the blood. These methods aren’t accurate, and even when they successfully identify a parasite egg, they can’t tell you the things you really need to know to eliminate the creature:

1. Which organ is the parasite in?
2. What symptoms is it likely to be causing?
3. Which medication eliminates it?
4. What is the exact dosage of the medication?
5. What is the correct number of times per day to take the medication?
6. How many days does the medication need to be taken for?
7. How do you confirm the parasite has been eliminated post-medication?

When I went through the stool testing process, not only was there no way to find this specific information, they couldn’t even find general information about which parasites I had. Then, on the illogical assumption that absence of proof was proof of absence, I was assured I had no parasites at all. This contradicted my expectations. Because 15 years of research (outlined in the previous article) had lead me to be certain that at least one parasite was at the root of my gluten issues, I wasn’t willing to stop looking until I found at least one. If the stool testing process failed to find it, rather than unquestioningly accepting the authority of a medically sanctioned test, I made the more difficult decision to interpret medical stool testing as a failed process.

So, I decided to start experimenting…again.

Pharmaceutical vs. Natural

Since I had exhausted all other things to muscle test, the only thing remaining that I had not experimented with was prescription pharmaceuticals. I proceeded on the very reasonable assumption that if an anti-parasite medication was truly beneficial against a parasite, there should be some muscle testing indication that this was so, since all muscle testing really shows is electromagnetic relationships at the biological level. By extension, if the various medicines tested for being needed, that should indicate the presence of the parasite those medicines treated, and that this might neatly bypass the failed stool testing process.

I was particularly optimistic about the potential for a muscle test of a prescription pharmaceutical to demonstrate the presence of a parasite because of these reasons:

1. The dosage of the chemical was carefully controlled in each tablet, so it would be possible to be scientific in muscle testing the quantities of each medicine. In addition to the fact that anti-parasite herbs and plants almost never work, the quantity of medicinally active chemical in a herbal tonic is impossible to quantify or repeat, since concentration varies from one plant to the next. Pharmaceuticals seemed to hold the potential to solve this issue.

2. People had already done the work for me. There was extensive pre-existing documentation about which dosages treated which parasites, so that provided a great frame of reference and I hoped it meant I wouldn’t need to reinvent the wheel.

3. Because pharmaceuticals are scientifically recognized, it would be possible develop a technical frame of reference that other scientists, doctors and researchers could relate to, and hopefully give me advice on.

The challenge I ran into was quite unexpected: as a non-doctor, non-pharmacist I couldn’t get my hands on any medicines to muscle test with.

Living in a technologically advanced, developed nation like Canada (e.g. a first world country) with ready access to healthcare has one major disadvantage that ironically, people in less developed nations don’t have to contend with: all parasite medicines that actually work are sold by prescription only. This reveals a neat little fallacy in first world thinking, one that is at the root of many first world parasite problems:

Premise: You can only get parasite pills by prescription
Premise: Someone can only write you a prescription if they find the parasite you need the pills for
Premise: Nobody can find the parasite you need the pills for
Conclusion: Therefore, you’re not going get a prescription
Conclusion: Therefore, you can’t take parasite pills
(Note: I am deliberately disregarding the frequently-found organisms Blastocystis Hominis and H. Pylori, which are merely symptoms of parasites but not parasites themselves, and DiEntamoeba Fragillis, which is easy to find but not pathogenic. I am also ignoring the over-the-counter parasite medicine Combantrin that is used for pinworms, but which is ineffective against the larger, more aggressive organisms that tend to be at the root of food allergies.)

And then you’re stuck. Modern medicine has been stuck at this stage for around 100 years now–so stuck in fact that some people have started wondering if there’s an agenda to stay stuck. I didn’t know or care if there was any such agenda: I had an agenda to get healthy again which meant I needed to find parasites and that’s what I focused on–the solution.

And to be clear, pharmaceutical science isn’t the only player in this drama. Natural medicine, thought of as alternative healthcare has for the same 100 years also been stuck in a biased, anti-pharmaceutical mindset where it is mistakenly believed that nothing chemical could possibly work, that only natural products can work. As I had already found out, natural products are practically useless against parasites so this mindset was equally problematic. An anti-chemical bias is as limited as an anti-natural bias, and is probably at the root of why no alternative health care practitioner has ever put much effort into experimenting with prescription pharmaceuticals.

In retrospect, I could see why everyone was getting stuck in their biases, medical and alternative practitioner alike. For my part, I had no vested interest in one perspective or the other, just in resolving my gluten issue and I felt that to do so, it was necessary to blend the two approaches: design and assemble a parasite medicine test kit made of prescription pharmaceutical drugs, and then develop a system of testing with it based on the alternative paradigm of muscle testing. I went to great lengths to get my hands on the various medicines to test with and had to learn the rudiments of the science of pharmacology along the way, but that’s a long story and not relevant here.

The point is that when I combined pharmacology, parasitology and muscle testing I started finding data nobody else had ever found, and I stumbled upon what seemed to be a new undiscovered science.

The Science of Muscle Testing for Parasites…
Explained in 4 Minutes

The main benefit of muscle testing is the speed with which you can find answers. In a scientific context, you can actually find what you’re looking for so quickly that you can move onto solving the next problem when other researchers have barely settled into working on the first problem. What could take days or weeks from a 20th century scientific mindset can be resolved in minutes with a 21st century muscle testing mindset. Decades of research can take place in an afternoon if you have the right testing equipment. It’s a game changer.

Imagine walking into an advanced math exam that you’ve got four hours to complete and finally, after strenuously writing out proofs for the whole allotted time, learning that the answer was in fact simply the number “2”. Now imagine that you could walk into that same exam, sit down and find out that the answer was the number “2” in 10 seconds flat, get perfect marks and then write another exam in another 10 seconds, get perfect marks on that one, then another, then another… A lifetime of advanced mathematics could be run through in a single hour. And in the second hour, you could start solving math problems that nobody had ever opened the page on: major mathematical/scientific discoveries. By hour three you would run into problems nobody else even knew existed and to solve them you would need to invent a whole new form of mathematics, a whole new way of thinking. By hour four you’re onto a whole new science, people are gathering around from the other desks to see what you’re doing. They ask for an explanation but how can they follow along when their questions are now so outdated, being based on the most rudimentary math problems?

This isn’t simply an allegory; it’s what I’ve done with muscle testing and parasites. What took four metaphorical hours to complete can be explained in four actual minutes:

Minute 1: Speeding up the Right Answers

Instead of spending large amounts of time, money and effort on inaccurate, incomplete tests that look for parasites in the wrong places and the wrong ways, why not find what you’re looking for effortlessly? The assumption is logical and so simple a child can understand it – if an organ muscle tests for needing certain parasite pills, that organ must be hosting the parasite those pills treat: if your small intestine is testing for tapeworm medicine, you probably have a tapeworm; if your lungs are testing for lung fluke medicine, you probably have a lung fluke.

This is obvious right? But then look at the implication: if one parasite medicine testing against one organ point indicates one parasite, then other parasites medicines that test against other organ points probably also indicate parasites in those locations, even if you weren’t looking for them. Suddenly you’re finding more parasites than you were looking for. How many more? How many medicines test against organ points in a given person? e.g. How many parasites do you think you have? This was the question I asked in pursuit of the parasite causing my gluten issue and at the outset, I thought the answer was “one”.

I found one, then another, then another. I started finding so many parasites that it took months to sift through the data and understand what I was finding.

Minute 2: New Answers to Major Questions

What I discovered was a body of information that nobody had ever opened the page on. It was a long, interesting process of discovery but there isn’t time to go into the details so I’ll jump right to the summary: in short, there are 5 medicines that you can muscle test to quantify the presence of most parasites that the human body gets: Mebendazole, Albendazole, Praziquantel, Ivermectin, Metronidazole.

Metronidazole treats & indicates Giardia and Amoeba.
Mebendazole treats & indicates various species of roundworm
Albendazole treats & indicates various species of hookworm
Ivermectin treats & indicates an important sub-category of roundworm called filarial roundworms
Praziquantel treats & indicates for all species of tapeworms and all flukes

If you want to find a parasite from one of the categories listed above, all you need to do is muscle test one of these medicines against one of your organ points (in technical terminology, you need to determine whether one of the medicines reactivates a weak response from an organ indicator point – muscle testing for parasites always requires that you start with a weak response, then the strong response to the medicine solves a problem you have found).

And very quickly, you will be overwhelmed by the data you’re collecting…because you will look for 1 parasite and find 10; you will look for 10 in someone really sick and find almost 100. You will be forced to doubt the data and ask the reasonable question: is this number of parasites even possible for the body to get??? Fascinatingly enough, the answer is yes, the human body hosts significantly more parasites than anyone realizes, and that’s not even the really interesting part…

The really interesting thing you will find when you start muscle testing for parasite with these medicines is a variable that has not been addressed in any report, study, write-up, journal, periodical, text book, course or curriculum: that when you muscle test the medicine against an organ point, quite often the number of pills the organ tests for needing will far exceed the number of pills traditionally thought to be needed. For example, Mebendazole 400 mg (or 4 pills) is known to treat Trichina (the pork roundworm) while Mebendazole 200 mg is known to treat Toxocara (the dog roundworm). In initial experiments, I assumed that the organs I tested would only indicate the need for Mebendazole 200 mg and 400 mg, not any higher dosages. But then I found that organs frequently tested for Meb. 800 mg, Meb. 1500 mg, Meb. 4200 mg and in fact every increment of Mebendazole from 100 mg up to around 7500 mg. When recorded on my initial list, it looked like this:

Meb. 100mg: Common Roundworm
Meb. 200mg: Dog Roundworm
Meb. 300mg: unknown
Meb. 400mg: Pork Roundworm
Meb. 500mg: unknown
Meb. 600mg: unknown
Meb. 700 through 7500mg: unknown

Those unfamiliar with Mebendazole need to understand that 7500 mg is an astronomical, unprecedented number. It corresponds with 75 pills of a medication most doctors tend to prescribe 1 pill of, making 7500 mg 75 times the standard dose. Bear in mind that for some organisms, Mebendazole needs to be taken 3x/day at the dose it’s testing for, so testing for Meb. 7500 mg implies 225 pills per day – an impossible, unsafe quantity to take. But that’s what some people test for, meaning that’s the parasite they have.

The same pattern presented itself with Albendazole:

Alb. 400mg: unspecified Roundworm (according to the textbooks)
Alb. 600mg: supposedly a fluke (according to the textbooks)
Alb. 800mg: Hookworm
Alb. 1200mg: unknown
Alb. 1400mg through 4000mg: unknown

The same pattern presented itself with Praziquantel:

Praz. 600mg x 1: n/a
Praz. 600mg x 2: Tapeworm
Praz. 600mg x 3: Dwarf Tapeworm
Praz. 600mg x 4: unknown
Praz. 600mg x 11: Intestinal Fluke
Praz. 600mg x 12 through 75: unknown

Pattern recognition: If Praz. 2(x 600mg) treats tapeworm (known), and if Praz. 11(x 600mg) treats intestinal fluke (known), then Praz. 75(x 600mg) must treat something (unknown) where “unknown” is probably a parasite. By that chain of reasoning, based on the sheer number of organ points that test for doses of parasite pills that don’t correspond with any textbook, it seems clear that there is a monumental quantity of parasites that modern microbiology is failing to find and by extension failing to treat.

This number is compounded when we factor in the same quantity of unknowns with both Praziquantel and Mebendazole and to a lesser extent Albendazole and Ivermectin, often in the same organ. Between Meb. 100mg to 7500mg, Alb. 200mg to 4000mg, Praz. 1(x600mg) to 75(x600mg) and Ivermectin 6mg to 36mg, we find there can be approximately 200 possible unique dosages of medications (assumed to be organisms in specific locations) that can be identified by this testing methodology, and these appear to be spread out among every organ, gland and region in the body including the skin, eyes and brain. Wow, the motherload.

What’s more, the combinations are different for every person tested, they are randomly specific to different organs and glands and seem to overlap neatly with regions where there is a symptomatic imbalance: exactly what we would expect to find if we were looking for a diverse, living colony of parasitic organisms in an organic superstructure like the human body.

I was looking for one gluten-loving parasite and found a flourishing ecosystem of parasites. I felt how I imagine the 18th century astronomer William Herschel must have felt when he was looking for a planet further out than Jupiter and found the universe.

Minute 3: A New Form of Parasite Mathematics

Recording these organisms is easiest if we can agree to adopt a simple form of notation: The organ’s initials: Stomach is “ST”; the medication’s abbreviation: Mebendazole is “Meb”; and the dosage in mg: 100mg is “100”. So the stomach testing for Mebendazole 100mg becomes ST-Meb 100 and we can understand this to indicate the presence of the common roundworm, since that’s what mebendazole 100mg treats. If I were to write ST-Meb 3200 then you would understand that the stomach was testing for 100 mg x 32 pills of roundworm medicine, and that this implied the presence of some species of roundworm in the stomach other than the common roundworm (e.g. an unknown species, since 3200mg is an unknown dosage).

A gluten reaction will often happen in the stomach, and stomach (ST) will often test for different dosages of medicines, indicating multiple species of parasite. Then small intestine (SI) will have its combinations of dosages. We need the notation outlined above as without it, the number of parasites we find will be too lengthy to write out in sentence form. Here is a common pattern of parasites for someone with celiac to have:

ST: Meb 100, Meb 400, Praz 2(600), Praz 11(600), Alb 800
SI: Meb 400, Meb 800, Meb 2600, Meb 3100, Praz 2(600), Praz 18(600), Praz 33(600), Praz 42(600), Alb 800, Alb 1600, Met 250
LI: Praz 2(600), Praz 3(600), Praz 4(600), Praz 33(600), Meb 2900, Alb 800

So, 17 total organisms or 17 distinct species, depending on how you prefer to interpret the data, but not necessarily all direct contributors to a gluten allergy.

Simply from reviewing these three organs, we can draw some fascinating conclusions and start to develop a parasite profile for the host:

* Praz 2(600) is tapeworm, which is clearly in the ST, SI and LI, meaning its a long, probably fully grown organism
* Meb 400, the pork roundworm, is in both ST and SI, and since it’s only 1mm long, the host clearly has a bad case of it (e.g. a very high count or load)
* Alb 800 is hookworm which is in ST, SI and LI. They have a bad case of that too, but in addition their SI has a second species of hookworm, Alb 1600, so if this person actually took the standard dose of medicine for hookworm (Alb 800) they would fail to eliminate their second species of hookworm, which would have needed to have been treated with 1600mg.
* They also have Giardia (Met 250) and three other species of intestinal fluke, probably all cousins of each other (Praz 18, 33 and 42) as well as Praz 3 & 4, which may be other species of tapeworms or could be flukes.

The fact is that every organ in nearly every adult body, particularly where there’s a medical condition going on will test for some combination of these parasite pills-a significantly greater quantity than any other testing methodology is currently finding. The average adult tests for 10-20 parasites and barely knows about it, while really sick people can test for as many as 75-100 species.

Here’s a sample chart of one of the thousands of assessments I conducted in the process of gathering this data. It reveals the diversity of parasites spread out over multiple organ locations. I hope you can read my handwriting, it’s a bit messy. I’ve added in the name of the organism these dosages correspond with.

It is interesting that anywhere there is a symptom, the area will test for different combinations of these medicines, leading to the conclusion that combinations of parasites cause symptoms related to medical conditions. The most fascinating point is that as the person’s body is treated with the medicines that test against the organs, the symptoms in those organs, such as celiac tend to be resolved, leading to the rather hopeful conclusion that parasites really are at the root of many medical conditions.

But more parasites than we thought, different parasites than we thought, different parasites than we are in the habit of finding. For the record, I’m not proposing any new, unknown species here but rather, cousins of the same species that we’re not in the habit of differentiating between, when in fact we should be. For example, there are 8 known types of bears in the world, why can’t there be 75 known types of roundworm? For a Biologist, this wouldn’t be a stretch of the imagination, and neither should it be one for you.

Could this be the new science of parasite identification and elimination? Could this be the future of resolving medical conditions? Could this be the future?

Well, it’s not that simple…

Minute 4: A Whole New Science

Somewhere along the way, by accident one day I discovered a fascinating principle. I had already identified that I could use the parasite medicine to find the parasite itself by testing the medicine against the organ point. This is expressible in the parasite mathematics outlined above, where Praz 11 (x 600mg) testing against stomach (e.g. ST Praz 11) indicates that the stomach has an intestinal fluke.

Building on this, the testing can be taken one critical step further: the parasite medicine (e.g. Praz 11) doesn’t necessarily need to be tested against the organ point (e.g. stomach), it can also be tested directly against the cause of the food allergy (e.g. gluten).

This bypasses the organ as a test point, which is vital if you’re not sure which organ the parasite is in to begin with, and uses the body’s bioelectric field itself to connect the electric field of the parasite medicine to the electric field of the allergen, and while the parasite itself is still inferred by the dosage, we can now infer something more substantial: which parasite is causing the gluten allergy. Understanding causality at this level is the key to understanding an allergy, e.g. which one, of all the parasites you have, is causing the allergy?

I call this method of relating the parasite medicine-to-the-organ, the organ-to-the-allergen and the allergen-to-the-parasite-medicine the Confirmation Triangle and it is how I have managed to quickly and successfully identify the root causes of a gluten allergy as well as every other allergy.

This information is vital not only to finding the cause of the allergy but also in confirming that the allergy had been fully resolved. You could have a total of 50 parasites, but perhaps only 5 are causing your gluten allergy. It may not be practical to get out all 50, but if you can target the 5 gluten-loving parasites specifically, you can eliminate the gluten allergy in quite a short time frame, confirm that it has been eliminated by retesting gluten, and at least in that regard, get on with your life, being free from gluten-free.

Consider the list below which has the added clarity of including the probable symptom the parasite is causing, using the parasite notation outlined above:

Contributors to a Gluten Allergy or Celiac:

1. Bloating I: ST-Alb 800 (hookworm)
2. Bloating II: SI-Praz 11 (intestinal fluke)
3. Diarrhea: ST/SI-Praz 20 (stomach fluke)
4. Anaphylaxis to gluten in the throat: ESO-Praz 18 (esophagus fluke)
5. Acne/Migraines: Sinus-Meb 400 (pork roundworm in sinuses)

The Confirmation Triangle can be used to confirm that specifically these 5 parasites were at the root of this person’s gluten allergy, and the organisms can then be eliminated systematically, with the expectation of the resolution to the gluten allergy upon their elimination. It is interesting to note that the root causes of the gluten allergy were spread over multiple species (roundworms, hookworms and flukes) and this is common, and perhaps the reason why no single parasite has ever been identified as the sole cause of a reaction to gluten or any other allergy. For those of you interested in the technical details about this, it has to do with the bacteria the parasites excrete and its interaction with the immune system of the celiac host.

However, on the surface this seems promising until we quickly run into anomalies with the dosages. The 5 parasites listed above (and corresponding dosages of the medicines needed to eliminate them) are not the only possible contributors to a gluten issue. Other parasites might also be contributors as each individual case can and will vary. Someone with celiac might test for Praz 37, Praz 55, Meb 42, Alb 32 and these dosages of parasite pills are too high to take. While this variation explains to my satisfaction the reason that no two cases of celiac are quite the same, it doesn’t help the person who is then stuck with a parasite, or set of parasites they can’t medicate, and by extension, stuck with a case of celiac they can’t eliminate using the information covered in this article. For the record, this will be most people as 3/4 of all parasites are found by dosages that surpass safe levels of the medicines. But now at least we know they’re in there…

The pills help us identify every parasites at the root of celiac and gluten allergies but in cases where the dosage of pills is too high to take, we are not always able to treat celiac with parasite medication. This means that treatment with these medicines is probably not practical. Since it can take weeks to complete a single medication, finding out after all that effort that you missed some of the contributors to your gluten issue, and still can’t eat it can be frustrating to say the least.

What seemed like a new science immediately brought up an awareness of a previously undefined problem: we can test medicines using parasite mathematics and the confirmation triangle to find parasites nobody has ever found before, but we can’t use the pills to treat those same parasites. It appears then that we’re stuck.

But this is also an example of how a stumbling block can become a stepping stone if used correctly. If parasite pills aren’t fully effective, they simply need to be improved or replaced as a means of eliminating the parasites. And bear in mind that medicinal anti-parasite herbs are useless for this purpose, they’re diluted, non-specific and generally ineffective. So barring an herbal option, I had two choices: either dissect the pharmacology to make the pills more effective or find a complete replacement for them. I decided it would be faster and more efficient to find a complete replacement for parasite medicines as a whole than develop a new form of parasite pill.

However, to be absolutely clear on why this was necessary, let’s quickly review the problems with parasite medications.

Problems with Parasite Medications

The main ones are these:

1. Medications have side effects, sometimes severe side effects even at approved, standard dosages.
2. Medications don’t always soak into the areas that are testing for needing them, even within the safe ranges. e.g. Praziquantel 22 (x600mg) will often test against kidneys, indicating the presence of a kidney fluke, but no duration of 22 praziquantel per day will ever bring the kidneys to the point where they are no longer testing for needing 22 pills, leading to the reasonable conclusion that praziquantel fails to adequately penetrate the kidney for therapeutic purposes.
3. In the world of pharmacology, nobody is able to distinguish between sub-species (cousins) of parasites to know that one species needs 11 pills and one needs 12 pills, they are forced to consult outdated textbooks which assert that everyone needs 4 pills, for example, so even when parasite testing labs do find evidence of these parasites, your Doctor will frequently and unknowingly write you a prescription that is too weak to work.
4. As an extension of point 3, there are maximum dosages of a medication, beyond which you can’t take them even if you’re muscle testing for needing them. For Praziquantel this is roughly 600mg x 33, so what do you do if you’re testing for 600mg x 34 pills or above? For Mebendazole this is roughly 100mg x 8, so what do you do if you’re testing for Meb 100mg x 9 to 75 pills?
5. Even when a medicine is correctly treating one parasite, it is likely to be poking-but-not-treating all your other parasites, and sometimes quite severe reactions can ensue that are not reactions to the medicine itself but more of an anaphylactic-type response to an organism you weren’t even thinking about and didn’t know you were poking-but-not-treating.
6. Even when the medicines work, they can require 3 months or more of treatment, a difficult time frame to fit into your busy life and a long time to experience negative side effects for.
7. Outlier groups can’t participate: infants, seniors, the very sick, pregnant women, breastfeeding mothers, people on other medications that might cause drug interactions.
8. If all these other hurdles are overcome, parasite pills can be very expensive in most developed countries ($20,000 USD or more for a multi-month course of them).
9. Even if you overcome all those hurdles and are willing to spend an obscene amount of money taking the pills (or perhaps have benefits or an understanding HMO), you’ll have to find a physician who is willing to write you a prescription in the absence of any evidence because the stool testing process wouldn’t have found most (or any) of the organisms you need to treat.

In short summary, if you actually tried to take the medicines to cure yourself of celiac (assuming you knew which ones to take, since the medication, dosage, frequency and duration vary by parasite and are therefore different for everyone), you’d feel side effects when you took the medicines, even then they don’t always work, even if they did your doctor would be unlikely to get the dosage right, even if they did sometimes the dose is too high to be safe and even when you did take them, more often than not they would irritate all your other parasites. Then, they could take months to work, more than half the people who need them can’t take them anyway, they can be extraordinarily expensive and after all that, your Doctor won’t be able to sign off on the full dosage regimen because the lab didn’t find anything, and told you with certainty that you didn’t have a single parasite.

So what seems on the surface like a bright new science of parasite identification and elimination very quickly turns into what looks like a dead end, only this time at a much more sophisticated level.

Sometimes the medicines work: A simple gluten issue that has one or two parasites at the root of it can be resolved at safe dosages of mild medications in a short time frame for all people with minimal side effects, and you or your doctor can and should be testing to see whether this is the case. But any complex gluten reaction is impossible to treat with medication, which is probably why so few people have ever successfully done it.

This is where the stumbling-block becomes a stepping-stone and it becomes clear that we need to replace parasite medicines as a means of eliminating parasites.

On a Personal Note

But to finish my story, I got lucky: After taking Meb 100, 200, and 400, Alb 800 and Praz 11, I had eliminated enough of my organisms that I was able to eat gluten, so in short, I did the whole thing with pharmacology. The doses were low enough to be safe, the parasites were in locations that the medicines could reach and I had the time, resources and motivation to experiment. I have eaten gluten every day of my life since that day, it has been roughly 10 years and while other symptoms took longer to resolve, my gluten allergy never came back. I was free from gluten free.

However, when I tried to share and reproduce my results with other people, it quickly became obvious that not everyone would be as lucky as me, and on the path to this realization it became apparent that it wasn’t my gluten allergy I needed to resolve, it was all gluten allergies. What would it take, I wondered, to repeatably resolve all gluten allergies, regardless of the limitations of parasite medicines outlined above?

To resolve every gluten issue, there needed to be a system of consistently eliminating every parasite in every host. Where my story about a gluten allergy ends, a bigger story begins. I didn’t write this article for myself, I wrote it for everyone else. This is now your story.

The Final Frontier: Elimination

Once we are agreed that a gluten allergy can be resolved by eliminating the underlying parasites, we have Clarification: parasites are absolutely the cause of a gluten issue.

The focus then moves to Quantification: disregarding medicinal herbs and instead muscle testing with prescription pharmaceuticals to find which parasites we have. As an added layer of sophistication we can employ the Confirmation Triangle to isolate which parasites are related to a gluten allergy specifically, as opposed to parasites we may also have but that are unrelated, and we can use Parasite Mathematics to quantify what we’ve found in simple list form.

The focus then urgently moves to Elimination. And unfortunately, while parasite medicines can and should be muscle tested to find the parasites we host, they cannot always be used to treat those same parasites. An alternative is needed, a better way of eliminating parasites, one not subject to the limitations of taking medicines.

Is there a way? If so, it would be the final frontier of modern medicine: the future of bioscience.

There is a way. However, it requires that we shift gears from chemistry (the science of pharmacology) to physics (the science of electrodynamics). The essence of the idea is that we can find the resonant frequency of the parasite and eliminate it using electromagnetism. This eliminates the organism while it is still inside the host without harming the host, without surgery, without radiation and without medication. In the final article of this series, I will outline how I developed and perfected this process and turned it into a repeatable science.

To be Continued…

This article is continued in: Be Free from Gluten Allergies for Life: Part 3–Elimination